Process model of affect misattribution procedure (#157)
How to Cite this Report
APA Style
Etienne P. LeBel. Process model of affect misattribution procedure. (2013, April 29). Retrieved 20:41, May 04, 2018 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU3MLA Style
"Process model of affect misattribution procedure" Etienne P. LeBel. 29 Apr 2013 14:33 04 May 2018, 20:41 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU3>MHRA Style
'Process model of affect misattribution procedure', Etienne P. LeBel, , 29 April 2013 14:33 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU3> [accessed 04 May 2018]Chicago Style
"Process model of affect misattribution procedure", Etienne P. LeBel, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU3 (accessed May 04, 2018)CBE/CSE Style
Process model of affect misattribution procedure [Internet]. Etienne P. LeBel; 2013 Apr 29, 14:33 [cited 2018 May 04]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTU3| Reference to Original Report of Finding | Payne, B., Hall, D. L., Cameron, C. D., & Bishara, A. J. (2010, Exp 1). A process model of affect misattribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1397-1408. |
| Title | Process model of affect misattribution procedure |
| If the original article contained multiple experiments, which one did you attempt to replicate? e.g., you might respond 'Study 1' or 'Experiment 4'. | Experiment 1 |
| Link to PDF of Original Report | |
| Brief Statement of Original Result | MPT process model of AMP is validated disentangling 3 component processes, affect toward prime (A), affect toward pictographs (P), and misattribution of A onto P). |
| Type of Replication Attempted | Highly Direct Replication |
| Result Type | Failure to Replicate |
| Difference? | Not Applicable |
| Number of Subjects | 143 |
| Number of Subjects in Original Study | 68 |
| Year in which Replication Attempt was Made | 2012 |
| Name of Investigators (Real Names Required) | Etienne P. LeBel |
| Detailed Description of Method/Results |
Exact instructions and task used as in original study; all original stimuli acquired from original author, including Excel spreadsheet to fit the MPT model. Though the MPT model fit the data very well, even given the much larger sample size of N = 143 (G-squared (df=2) = .84, p > .05, critical value = 5.99), the CRITICAL difference in parameter M across pictograph duration condition was in the opposite direction (i.e., M = .91 in the 1,000 ms pictograph duration condition vs. M = .82 in the 100 ms pictograph duration). Differences in the A and P parameters across prime pleasantness and pictograph pleasantness were, however, in the expected direction and statistically significant (nested model with additional relevant constraint led to significant increases in Gsquared). |
| Any Known Methodological Differences (between original and present study)? | Two minor differences which were not anticipated a priori – based on published and intuitive bases – to alter the likelihood of replicating the effect: (1) Canadian undergraduates will be used rather than American undergraduates (2) Participants will be run in groups of 1 to 5 rather than separately as in original study |
| Email of Investigator |
|
| Name of individuals who actually carried out the project | Experienced 5th-year undergraduate research assistant |
| Location of Project | Canada |
| Characteristics of Subjects (subject pool, paid, etc.) | University students from subject pool |
| Where did these subjects reside? | Canada |
| Was this a Class Project? | No |
| Further Details of Results as pdf | |
| Additional Comments | |
| Email of Original Investigator |
|
| Quantitive Information | |
| I have complied with ethical standards for experimentation on human beings and, if necessary, have obtained appropriate permission from an Institutional Review Board or other oversight group. | |
| TAG: Attention TAG: JDM TAG: Language TAG: Learning TAG: Memory TAG: Perception TAG: Performance TAG: Problem Solving TAG: Social Cognition TAG: Social Psychology TAG: Thinking | |
