Facilitation of Recall exact replication (#125)

Return to View Chart

How to Cite this Report

APA Style

Patrizio E. Tressoldi. Facilitation of Recall exact replication. (2012, August 19). Retrieved 00:54, February 22, 2018 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1

MLA Style

"Facilitation of Recall exact replication" Patrizio E. Tressoldi. 19 Aug 2012 13:14 22 Feb 2018, 00:54 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1>

MHRA Style

'Facilitation of Recall exact replication', Patrizio E. Tressoldi, , 19 August 2012 13:14 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1> [accessed 22 February 2018]

Chicago Style

"Facilitation of Recall exact replication", Patrizio E. Tressoldi, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1 (accessed February 22, 2018)


Facilitation of Recall exact replication [Internet]. Patrizio E. Tressoldi; 2012 Aug 19, 13:14 [cited 2018 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MTI1

Reference to Original Report of Finding Bem, D. (2011)Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and AffectJournal of Personality and Social Psychology,Vol. 100, No. 3, 407"“425
Title Facilitation of Recall exact replication
If the original article contained multiple experiments, which one did you attempt to replicate? e.g., you might respond 'Study 1' or 'Experiment 4'.
Link to PDF of Original ReportView Article
Brief Statement of Original Result Word priming presented after a congruent picture reduce the RTs for its recognition with respect to the incongruent pairs as it is typically observed in the classical priming protocol when the priming is presented before the pictures.
Type of Replication Attempted Fairly Direct Replication
Result Type Successful Replication
Difference? Same Direction, 0.014
Number of Subjects 100
Number of Subjects in Original Study 50
Year in which Replication Attempt was Made 2012
Name of Investigators (Real Names Required) Patrizio E. Tressoldi
Detailed Description of Method/Results Results
Mean "“ 95% CI SD Min - Max
Practice 10.18 (9.5 to 10.7) 3.01 4 - 18
Control 9.47 (8.8 "“ 10.1) 3.17 1 - 17

Paired t test:
Mean difference: 0.71; SD: 3.27; 95%CI: 0.08 "“ 1.38; t(99) = 2.23; p = 0.014 (one-tailed); effect size d = 0.22; r = 0.45

Any Known Methodological Differences
(between original and present study)?
The only difference with respect the original study, was the creation of word lists in Italian (not translation), but using the same criteria (e.g. category types, use frequency). We used the software made available by Bem (http://dbem.ws/psistuff).
Email of Investigator
Name of individuals who
actually carried out the project
a research assistant
Location of ProjectLab facilities of Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Padova University-ITALY
Characteristics of Subjects
(subject pool, paid, etc.)
University students from subject pool
Where did these subjects reside?Unspecified
Was this a Class Project?No
Further Details of Results as pdf
Additional Comments
Email of Original Investigator
Quantitive Information
I have complied with ethical standards for experimentation on human beings and, if necessary, have obtained appropriate permission from an Institutional Review Board or other oversight group.
TAG: Attention TAG: JDM TAG: Language TAG: Learning TAG: Memory TAG: Perception TAG: Performance TAG: Problem Solving TAG: Social Cognition TAG: Social Psychology TAG: Thinking

Are you posting an unpublished replication attempt that you conducted yourself, or noting a published replication attempt?

Post Unpublished
Post Published