An Archive of Replication Attempts in Experimental Psychology

[What's New]
Show me postings from the past


Restrict to Specific Topics [Hide Options]
Toggle All Attention Behavior Genetics Development: Cognitive Development: Perception Development: Social JDM Language Learning Memory
Perception Performance Personality Problem Solving Psychometrics and IQ Psychopathology/Clinical Social Cognition Social Psychology Thinking
Include class projects


If you wish to submit details of your own replication attempt, you need to log in.

This Chart View provides an overview of each posting in the current group. To see the details of any one article, click on the View More Details of Posting link in the Title column.

Title Reference to Original Report of Finding Brief Statement of Original Result Type of Replication AttemptedResult TypeDifference? Number of SubjectsNumber of Subjects in Original Study Year in which Replication Attempt was MadeName of Investigators Tags How to Cite this Posting
Literary fiction did not improve affective ToM View More Details of Posting!Kidd, D.C. & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377-380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918 View Article Participants read either literary fiction or non-fiction and then completed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). The Literary Fiction group (M = 25.90) outperformed the Nonfiction group (M = 23.47), F(1, 82) = 6.40, p = .01. Fairly Direct ReplicationFailure to Replicate Opposite Direction, 0.72 104 86 2015Andrew Liu and Stephen WantSocial Cognition, Social Psychology View

APA Style

Andrew Liu and Stephen Want. Literary fiction did not improve affective ToM. (2015, June 01). Retrieved 13:28, August 19, 2017 from http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjI1

MLA Style

"Literary fiction did not improve affective ToM" Andrew Liu and Stephen Want. 01 Jun 2015 10:01 19 Aug 2017, 13:28 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjI1>

MHRA Style

'Literary fiction did not improve affective ToM', Andrew Liu and Stephen Want, , 01 June 2015 10:01 <http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjI1> [accessed 19 August 2017]

Chicago Style

"Literary fiction did not improve affective ToM", Andrew Liu and Stephen Want, , http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjI1 (accessed August 19, 2017)

CBE/CSE Style

Literary fiction did not improve affective ToM [Internet]. Andrew Liu and Stephen Want; 2015 Jun 01, 10:01 [cited 2017 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.PsychFileDrawer.org/replication.php?attempt=MjI1

Are you posting an unpublished replication attempt that you conducted yourself, or noting a published replication attempt?

Post Unpublished
Post Published